For Content Teams

Write content AI actually cites.

You ship great writing. Nobody reads it, because AI got there first and cited Reddit. Renown shows you which sources AI pulls from, what makes content citable, and whether the last thing you shipped actually worked.

Where AI pulls from

When it talks about you.

Yours

33%

Reddit
31%
Your blog
22%
G2
14%
Your docs
11%
Hacker News
9%
Competitor blog
8%
Other
5%

Optimize here: Reddit and G2 drive 45% of your citations.

What you're dealing with

The problem, in three parts

01

You publish a well-researched piece. Nothing happens. Reddit gets cited instead.

You wrote a better thing. It didn't matter.

02

The team wants to know why we should keep investing in content if AI is cannibalizing clicks.

You don't have numbers to make the case.

03

Every guide says 'structure content for AI' but nobody shows you what that actually looks like.

Specific beats vague. You need specific.

How Renown helps

Three things that matter for your role

A day in the life

A content lead's week, with the AI feedback loop closed

Monday, 11:00 AM

Editorial planning. Open Renown. The top-cited competitor piece this month is an explainer on buying criteria. You don't have one. That's the top of the backlog now.

Editorial planning

Top cited competitor angle:

"How to pick a vendor when AI is the buyer"

Reddit14 citationsGap

Thursday, 2:15 PM

Run the readiness audit on a post you're about to publish. It's strong, but missing schema. Ten-minute fix. Citation probability score jumps from 41 to 78. You ship the fixed version.

Page health · /blog/schema-guide

Q&A blocks✓ 6 found
Schema markup⚠ Missing
TL;DR present
Citable specificity✓ High

Fix one thing, citation probability up ~40%.

Friday, 4:30 PM

Eleven days after publish, Claude cites the schema guide by name. Your first AI citation. You screenshot it. The writer who spent two weeks on it actually smiles.

First citation · just now

C
Claudecited you

"According to [Your Brand]'s guide on schema markup, the Q&A format produces the highest citation rates..."

First citationPublished 11 days ago

Right-sized for you

Starter tracks the full publish-to-citation loop.

Daily citation monitoring, page-level audits, and trend data for $89/mo. If you're running content for a team under 20 people, this gets you the feedback loop your CMS never gave you.

Starter

$89/mo

See all plans

Find out what AI thinks of your brand

Warning: may cause existential crisis.